Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Oncodevelopmental plasticity of the skeleton in myeloid neoplasms
doi: 10.64898/2026.03.19.712939
Figure Lengend Snippet: a, Intercellular communication networks in paired maxillary jawbones comparing JAK2V617F versus JAK2WT conditions. b, Cell-cell communication depicting ligand (L)-receptor(R) interaction between maxillary stromal cells (sender) and myeloid cells (receiver). Interactions are represented based on the difference in delta probability of mean LR expression between JAK2V617F and JAK2WT. c, Thrombospondin 1 (Thbs1) expression across transcriptionally defined stromal subclusters in the maxilla. d, Schematic overview of the murine thrombopoietin (ThPO)–driven myelofibrosis model. c-Kit–enriched hematopoietic stem cells isolated from WT donors were lentivirally transduced with ThPO or empty vector (EV) and transplanted into bigenic CreER;tdTomato reporter recipients (Gli1;tdTomato, Pdgfrb;tdTomato and Grem1;tdTomato). Following tamoxifen induction and lethal irradiation, recipients received donor cells intravenously. TdTomato⁺ stromal cells were isolated from mesoderm-derived bones for single-cell RNA sequencing, and tibias from the same cohorts were used for Visium spatial transcriptomics. e, Thbs1 expression in 17 annotated stromal subclusters under fibrotic (ThPO) and control (EV) conditions in mesoderm-derived bones. f-g, UMAP representation of integrated Visium spatial transcriptomics data from ThPO and EV tibias (n = 3 mice per group), identifying five major spatial domains (f) and corresponding Thbs1 expression patterns (g) . h, Representative overlay image of H&E and spatial domains detected in tibias from Visium spatial transcriptomics, n=3 per group. i, Thbs1 expression from Visium spatial transcriptomics dataset in both fibrosis (ThPO) and control (EV) conditions. j-k, Representative images of Thbs1-stained tibias in fibrosis (ThPO) and control (EV) groups (j) and the quantification of Thbs1+ cells per tissue area (k) . Scale bars, 50µm. l-m, Representative images of Thbs1-stained maxillary bones in both JAK2 and JAK2V617F conditions (l) and the quantification of Thbs1+ cells per tissue area (m) . Scale bars, 50µm. n, Thbs1 expression across nine annotated periodontal stromal subclusters from human tooth biopsies of MPN-periodontitis (n = 3), periodontitis without MPN (n = 3), and healthy controls (n = 1). Stromal subclusters are ordered according to cell-state prioritization by Augur (from left to right). o, Cell-cell communication depicting ligand (L)-receptor(R) interactions between patients’ tooth fibroblast subpopulation (sender) and myeloid cells (receiver). Interactions are represented based on the difference in delta probability of mean LR expression between MPN-Periodontitis (N=3) and healthy control (N=1) patients. p-q, Representative images of Thbs1-stained BM biopsies from MPN (N=7) and healthy (N=3) patients (p) and the quantification of Thbs1+ cells per tissue area (q) . Scale bars, 50µm. r-s, ELISA of Thbs1 (r) and its interaction partner CD47 (s) in plasma of MPN (N=293) and healthy (N=74) individuals. t, Schematic overview of 3D in vitro experiment. JAK2V617F;RFP+ iPSCs were differentiated into CD34+ cells and engrafted into mature healthy iPSC-derived BM organoids. Organoids were harvested 7, 14 and 21 days post engraftment of exogenous cells. u, Flow cytometry analysis depicting the frequency of donor-derived (JAK2V617F;RFP+) red blood cells (RBCs), megakaryocytes and monocytes. Cells were isolated from BM organoids after 7, 14 and 21 days post engraftment of exogenous cells. Two-way-ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s was used. v, qRT-PCR analysis from BM organoid-derived cells after 7, 14 and 21 days post engraftment of exogenous cells. One-way-ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s was used.
Article Snippet: On day 14 of SpinEB protocol (see above), EB-derived cells from JAK2V617F;RFP and JAK2WT;GFP iPSC lines were harvested and CD34+ cells were enriched by magnetic-activated cell sorting using CD34 UltraPure MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec, #130-100-453) for subsequent use as donor cells for bone marrow organoids.
Techniques: Expressing, Isolation, Transduction, Plasmid Preparation, Irradiation, Derivative Assay, Single Cell, RNA Sequencing, Spatial Transcriptomics, Control, Staining, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Clinical Proteomics, In Vitro, Flow Cytometry, Quantitative RT-PCR